Mesorat%20hashas for Temurah 65:38

אמר לך ר' יוחנן

But then are we to say that this refutes Resh Lakish?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' We see that the Baraitha deals with the case of an animal blemished from the beginning and we can therefore say that the reason why the Rabbis hold that the animals are redeemed is because the blemish preceded the dedication, but if the dedication preceded the blemish, then even the Rabbis will hold that they are buried. This would be unlike the opinion of Resh Lakish who holds that dedications for the altar are not included in the law of being presented and appraised.');">²⁴</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Temurah 65:38. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.